
We're talking
SEC Football!
We're talking
SEC Football!

After losing to the unranked, 1-3, Florida Gators & falling to 3-2 on the year, both the AP poll & the Coaches poll have completely dropped the University of Texas from their NCAA Football Top 25 Rankings. It was just a month ago the narrative around the Horns, & their 0-1 record was, "that's a quality, one-score, road loss at Ohio State 14-7". I wonder if by one-score game, they meant the margin of defeat was one score. Or, as is also applicable in this instance, a game you lose & you can only score once? in all seriousness, even for an Aggie that conclusion wasn't entirely indigestible. Although, most acknowledged that at times it appeared Arch Manning was experiencing significant mechanical hiccups in his throwing motion. In particular on his deep balls, I noticed his wrist was cocked sideways at the apex of his motion, which prevents a proper release of the football, & resulted in Arch going 17/30 for 170 yards & an INT.
That wasn't shocking, against Ohio State. But, what was totally unexpected was Texas to then come out in weeks 2-4, as they did. In those three games, against weak Group of 5ers; San Jose, UTEP, & Sam Houston, UT failed to notch one commanding victory. The formerly #1 Ranked Texas Longhorns, hit their bye week 3-1, having not played near the level of a #1 team, & frankly not near the level of a top 10 team.
The Longhorns, fresh off their bye week, did not appear to be prepared to play an SEC conference game. The UT defense which was widely touted as "among the best in the country", received a beatdown by a QB & a Head Coach that were both on metaphorical life support going into Saturday. Failures by the punting unit allowed a Florida to block a punt, which lead to a Safety. But, by halftime it was clear the core problem that must be addressed isn't on the defense or special teams.
The problem sits squarely upon the offense. Blame has been passed around & dropped on the play calling, lack of a quality back, & now after this week its, "...the O-Line isn't blocking". I went back & watched every offensive possession UT had against Florida. After watching each play, it's not the O-Lines fault. A QB & Head Coach that fails to say, "the guys up front gave us everything they had. I just have to be better, if we're going to win." when asked what's the problem! The problem is Arch. If you just watch the first half of that game, it is glaringly obvious Arch's QB play is killing UT. Arch just can not go through his progressions in enough time to deliver the football. It's almost hard to understand, how on the first drive, Arch wasn't able to pull the trigger on a screen pass. That particular play seems to be the genesis of the "O-Line can't block" narrative. It certainly isn't the greatest look for an Offensive Lineman, when their QB can't handle the pressure on a screen pass! There were several instances where UT had 2-3 illegal men down field, blocking DBs, & no penalties were called. All Arch needed to do was complete the simplest dump off to the TE or RB, but he couldn't execute these simple passes. In my review of the tape, I never saw one blown O-Line protection, leading to free rushers. Arch had the time to get the job done. The SEC game looked too fast for the tiny private school product, & he just froze. When Florida left a LB to spy on Arch, it got even worse. I suppose if I were Steve Sarkisian, I would go down with Arch. But, if I am one of the offensive linemen being saddled with the blame, to protect the QB's emotions & image, at the expensive of my draft stock. I am going to let them know what it really looks like when an "O-Line isn't blocking", before I hop in the transfer portal.

#4 Ole Miss & #5 Texas A&M capture conference wins, both moving to 5-0, & firmly a top the SEC Standings! Carrying a perfect record halfway into the season wasn't out of the realm of possibility for either team. If either, or both, Ole Miss & A&M were to finish SEC play unblemished. It would catapult both of these legit SEC players right into the National Spotlight.
SEC Football Talk proposes a New Playoff format structured around, n
ot the Committee's Ranking of each Individual Team. Rather by a Cumulative Ranking by the Committee of each of the Conferences in their entirety. Each Conference is to be Ranked weekly, based on the collective performance of the entirety of the conference membership. Following the final Conference Championship Game of the season, the committee will announce the final Conference Rankings, thus naming the Playoff Conferences.
The 5 Playoff Conferences will receive a share of the total 15 individual Playoff Bids based upon their Final Conference Rankings; the #1 Conference receives 5 Bids, #2 receives 4 Bids, #3 receives 3 Bids, #4 receives 2 Bids & #5 receives 1 Bid. Individual Playoff Bids are then to be distributed by each Conference, to its teams in accordance with their Final Conference Standings.
The 16th & Final At-Large Bid will be directly granted by the CFP Commitee & shall be an Independent, a Service Academy, or a member of any conference outside of the Power 4 (SEC, Big 10, ACC, & Big 12).
Conference #1 - Conference's Top 5 Finishers,
Conference #2 - Conference's Top 4 Finishers,
Conference #3 - Conference's Top 3 Finishers,
Conference #4 - Conference's Top 2 Finishers,
Conference #5 - Conference Champion,
At-Large - Independent, Service Academy, or FCS .

Mark Twain once said, "Don't argue with stupid people. They'll just drag you down to their level, then beat you with experience.".
We'll soon be playing 9 SEC conference games next season. The current 8 game SEC schedule has certainly left fans feeling unfulfilled. But, is 9 the right amount of SEC games?
Here's why SEC Football Talk says - 11 is Heaven!
The argument for playing a soft schedule, with 2-3 lesser opponents to start your season, is a sound one. Admittedly, it's not easy for the fan base to get excited for a season opener against the Citadel, it's virtually impossible at Week 11! These late season cupcakes aren't doing our Teams any favors, as they prepare for the CFP or bowl season. Our duty & responsibility is to our member schools, broadcast partners & fans. In no way is it incumbent upon the SEC to continue playing lesser programs, just as a financial favor to those teams. Furthermore, the SEC has a duty to maximize its profits for its member institutions & it's broadcast partners.
In addition to the financial benefits to the SEC, limiting out of conference matchups protect the power, or the perception thereof. With an 11 game SEC schedule, the opportunity remains to play one Natural Rivalry Game. Long standing non-conference games such as; UF vs Miami, South Carolina vs. Clemson, & UGA vs. Geo. Tech all being historic in-state rivalries, remain valuable to the SEC. Teams without a Natural Rival should only schedule Power 4 Conference Opponents. There is not upside in a 77-0 blowout over East Texas A&M for an SEC school. That should be the result. The only impact such a game might have on the SEC as a whole, is a potentially damaging if a miracle occurs.
Finally, going to an 11 game SEC schedule will allow our teams to play each other, at least every other year. When A&M & Mizz joined in the SEC in 2012, who would have thought that in 2025, we would say the Aggies have been to ole' Rocky Top...ONCE!
Kickoff
DaysDays
HrsHours
MinsMinutes
SecsSeconds
Get access to extra episodes you sign up for our newsletter!
We use cookies to analyze website traffic and optimize your website experience. By accepting our use of cookies, your data will be aggregated with all other user data.